Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
URTH vs VGT: how they differ
URTH and VGT hold 28% of their weight in the same names, and VGT returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI World ETF and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, URTH and VGT hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | URTH | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | 5.64% | 16.85% |
| APPLE INC. | 5.04% | 14.59% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | 3.50% | 9.47% |
| BROADCOM INC. | 2.21% | 4.21% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 1.20% | 4.21% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 0.92% | 3.21% |
| INTEL CORPORATION | 0.57% | 2.03% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. | 0.52% | 1.85% |
| LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION | 0.44% | 1.56% |
| ORACLE CORPORATION | 0.43% | 1.46% |
| PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. | 0.39% | 1.35% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. | 0.39% | 1.40% |
| Only in URTH | Only in VGT |
|---|---|
| AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.86% | Sandisk Corp/DE 0.98% |
| ALPHABET INC. 2.43% | MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc 0.16% |
| ALPHABET INC. 2.01% | Akamai Technologies Inc 0.16% |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.51% | MKS Instruments Inc 0.14% |
| TESLA, INC. 1.35% | Lattice Semiconductor Corp 0.14% |
| ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 0.97% | TTM Technologies Inc 0.14% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 0.90% | DigitalOcean Holdings Inc 0.14% |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 0.72% | Fabrinet 0.14% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | VGT Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | MSCI World | Information technology |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.4% | +35.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.1 pts | +17.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.24% | 0.09% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 70.3% | 86.9% |
| Holdings | 1322 | 317 |
URTH in plain words
URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1322 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.
VGT in plain words
VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, URTH or VGT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, URTH returned +17.4% and VGT returned +35.4%, so VGT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, URTH or VGT?
- URTH charges 0.24% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so VGT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do URTH and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 70% of URTH and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 28% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, URTH against VGT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/URTH-VGT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources