Which returned more over the last year, URA or VTI?

In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, URA returned +19.6% and VTI returned +20.0%, so VTI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, URA or VTI?

URA charges 0.69% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do URA and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 0% of URA and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Are URA and VTI the same kind of fund?

No. URA is a thematic ETF and VTI is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

URA vs VTI

Name: ETFIQ comparison of URA and VTI
Creator: ETFIQ
License: https://etfiq.com/standards/

Global X Uranium ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

URA and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	URA Global X Uranium ETF	VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sits	Themes desk	Core fund
Issuer	Global X	Vanguard
What it is	Nuclear and uranium	US total market
Total return, 1 year	+19.6%	+20.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+20.0%	+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.4 pts	+0.0 pts
Expense ratio	0.69%	0.03%
Already in the S&P 500	0.0%	88.3%
Holdings	52	3531

URA in plain words

By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 52 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 47.6% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.

VTI in plain words

VTI is a index equity fund tracking US total market. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, URA or VTI?: In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, URA returned +19.6% and VTI returned +20.0%, so VTI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, URA or VTI?: URA charges 0.69% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do URA and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 0% of URA and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Are URA and VTI the same kind of fund?: No. URA is a thematic ETF and VTI is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, URA against VTI, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/URA-VTI.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources