Which returned more over the last year, TLT or VT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −6.4% and VT returned +18.9%, so VT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, TLT or VT?

TLT charges 0.15% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

TLT vs VT: how they differ

TLT is a bond index fund and VT an equity index fund, and over the year VT returned more, +18.9% against −6.4%.

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

TLT and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF	VT Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	20+ year Treasuries	Total World Stock
Total return, 1 year	−6.4%	+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−23.9 pts	+1.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.06%
Holdings	not filed	10042

TLT in plain words

TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, TLT or VT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −6.4% and VT returned +18.9%, so VT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, TLT or VT?: TLT charges 0.15% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TLT against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TLT against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/TLT-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources