Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
TLT vs VGSH: how they differ
TLT and VGSH are both bond index funds, and over the year VGSH returned more, +1.8% against −6.4%.
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Index Fund.
| TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | 20+ year Treasuries | Short-Term Treasury |
| Total return, 1 year | −6.4% | +1.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −23.9 pts | −15.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | not filed | 91 |
TLT in plain words
TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.
VGSH in plain words
VGSH is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, TLT or VGSH?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −6.4% and VGSH returned +1.8%, so VGSH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, TLT or VGSH?
- TLT charges 0.15% a year and VGSH charges 0.03%, so VGSH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, TLT against VGSH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/TLT-VGSH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources