Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
TBJL vs TLT: how they differ
TBJL and TLT are measured over different days, and TLT charges 0.15% against 0.79%.
Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - Jul and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.
| TBJL Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - Jul | TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Buffer ETF | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Innovator | iShares |
| What it is | Defined outcome, 9% on TLT | 20+ year Treasuries |
| Total return, 1 year | not published | −6.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | not published | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | not available | −23.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.15% |
TBJL in plain words
From its price on Sep 12, 2026, the fund can gain about 60.0% more before it reaches its cap. Protection left, in index points: 2.6% of the 9.0% buffer still sits below today's TLT level. 292 days remained on Sep 12, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
TLT in plain words
TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, TBJL or TLT?
- TBJL charges 0.79% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so TLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- Are TBJL and TLT the same kind of fund?
- No. TBJL is a buffer ETF and TLT is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, TBJL against TLT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/TBJL-TLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources