Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

TAN vs VTI

Invesco Solar ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, TAN and VTI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions TAN and VTI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingTANVTI
First Solar, Inc.11.74%0.03%
Nextpower Inc.9.81%0.02%
Enphase Energy, Inc.8.75%0.01%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, I3.46%0.01%
Clearway Energy, Inc.2.51%0.01%
Sunrun Inc.4.83%0.00%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.3.38%0.00%
Array Technologies, Inc.2.42%0.00%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in TANOnly in VTI
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. 7.58%NVIDIA Corp 6.37%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. 6.32%Apple Inc 5.88%
Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources L 5.09%Microsoft Corp 3.84%
O.Y. Nofar Energy Ltd. 4.21%Amazon.com Inc 3.19%
Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente, S.A. 3.07%Alphabet Inc 2.90%
GCL-Poly Energy Holdings Ltd. 3.00%Broadcom Inc 2.48%
Energix Renewable Energies Ltd. 2.69%Alphabet Inc 2.29%
Grenergy Renovables S.A. 2.25%Micron Technology Inc 1.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

TAN and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sitsThemes deskCore fund
IssuerInvescoVanguard
What it isClean energyUS total market
Total return, 1 year+14.3%+20.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.6 pts+0.0 pts
Expense ratio0.70%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50011.7%88.3%
Holdings313531

TAN in plain words

By weight, 12% of TAN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 65% of the fund across 31 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.6 pts. It sits 60.4% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.

VTI in plain words

VTI is a index equity fund tracking US total market. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, TAN or VTI?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TAN returned +14.3% and VTI returned +20.0%, so VTI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, TAN or VTI?
TAN charges 0.70% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do TAN and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 12% of TAN and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are TAN and VTI the same kind of fund?
No. TAN is a thematic ETF and VTI is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TAN against VTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TAN against VTI, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/TAN-VTI.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources