Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPYG vs XOVR: how they differ

SPYG and XOVR hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and SPYG returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPYG and XOVR hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPYG and XOVR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPYGXOVR
NVIDIA Corp13.66%9.48%
Alphabet Inc5.91%6.53%
Meta Platforms Inc3.49%4.47%
Tesla Inc2.07%1.63%
Palantir Technologies Inc0.75%0.56%
Arista Networks Inc0.49%2.31%
AppLovin Corp0.39%3.95%
Robinhood Markets Inc0.22%3.56%
DoorDash Inc0.20%2.04%
Monolithic Power Systems Inc0.19%1.77%
Axon Enterprise Inc0.08%2.60%
Veeva Systems Inc0.05%3.17%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPYGOnly in XOVR
Microsoft Corp 7.81%Astera Labs Inc 7.75%
Apple Inc 5.99%Natera Inc 3.70%
Broadcom Inc 5.04%Reddit Inc 2.78%
Alphabet Inc 4.71%Affirm Holdings Inc 2.64%
Micron Technology Inc 3.67%Rocket Lab Corp 2.50%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%Mongodb Inc 2.29%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.67%Roku Inc 2.16%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.67%Tempus Ai Inc 2.06%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

SPYG and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPYG
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF
XOVR
ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetERShares
What it isSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 GrowthPrivate-Public Crossover
Total return, 1 year+17.9%0.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.4 pts−17.5 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.75%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%43.4%
Holdings14732

SPYG in plain words

SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.

XOVR in plain words

XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPYG or XOVR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYG returned +17.9% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPYG or XOVR?
SPYG charges 0.04% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPYG and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYG and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPYG against XOVR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYG against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPYG-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources