Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPYG vs XLK: how they differ
SPYG and XLK hold 52% of their weight in the same names, and XLK returned more over the year.
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SPYG and XLK hold 52% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SPYG | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 13.66% | 14.66% |
| Microsoft Corp | 7.81% | 8.38% |
| Apple Inc | 5.99% | 12.86% |
| Broadcom Inc | 5.04% | 5.41% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 3.67% | 5.42% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.67% | 5.28% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.62% | 3.20% |
| Lam Research Corp | 1.53% | 3.02% |
| KLA Corp | 1.11% | 2.20% |
| Sandisk Corp | 0.95% | 1.88% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 0.75% | 1.49% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 0.69% | 2.59% |
| Only in SPYG | Only in XLK |
|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc 5.91% | Intel Corp 3.68% |
| Alphabet Inc 4.71% | Texas Instruments Inc 1.51% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.49% | Western Digital Corp 1.23% |
| Amazon.com Inc 3.48% | QUALCOMM Inc 1.09% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 2.67% | Analog Devices Inc 1.08% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.58% | Salesforce Inc 0.71% |
| Tesla Inc 2.07% | Dell Technologies Inc 0.70% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.68% | Synopsys Inc 0.48% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| SPYG State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF | XLK State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | State Street |
| What it is | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth | Technology |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.9% | +39.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.4 pts | +21.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 147 | 74 |
SPYG in plain words
SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.
XLK in plain words
XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPYG or XLK?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYG returned +17.9% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SPYG or XLK?
- SPYG charges 0.04% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SPYG and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYG and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 52% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYG against XLK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPYG-XLK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources