Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPYG vs XLC: how they differ
SPYG and XLC hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and SPYG returned more over the year.
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SPYG and XLC hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SPYG | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc | 5.91% | 13.10% |
| Alphabet Inc | 4.71% | 10.44% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 3.49% | 19.93% |
| Netflix Inc | 0.85% | 4.84% |
| Take-Two Interactive Software Inc | 0.06% | 5.26% |
| Electronic Arts Inc | 0.06% | 4.64% |
| Live Nation Entertainment Inc | 0.04% | 3.50% |
| EchoStar Corp | 0.04% | 1.67% |
| TKO Group Holdings Inc | 0.04% | 1.53% |
| Fox Corp | 0.02% | 1.26% |
| Fox Corp | 0.01% | 0.79% |
| Only in SPYG | Only in XLC |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 13.66% | Comcast Corp 4.71% |
| Microsoft Corp 7.81% | Warner Bros Discovery Inc 4.67% |
| Apple Inc 5.99% | Walt Disney Co/The 4.49% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.04% | T-Mobile US Inc 4.16% |
| Micron Technology Inc 3.67% | Verizon Communications Inc 4.15% |
| Amazon.com Inc 3.48% | AT&T Inc 4.10% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 2.67% | Omnicom Group Inc 2.51% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.67% | Charter Communications Inc 1.44% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| SPYG State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF | XLC State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | State Street |
| What it is | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth | Communication services |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.9% | −2.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.4 pts | −19.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 147 | 23 |
SPYG in plain words
SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.
XLC in plain words
XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 76.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPYG or XLC?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYG returned +17.9% and XLC returned −2.0%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SPYG or XLC?
- SPYG charges 0.04% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SPYG and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYG and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 15% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYG against XLC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPYG-XLC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources