Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPYG vs VUG: how they differ

SPYG and VUG hold 77% of their weight in the same names, and SPYG returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF and Vanguard Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPYG and VUG hold 77% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPYG and VUG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPYGVUG
NVIDIA Corp13.66%12.63%
Microsoft Corp7.81%7.62%
Apple Inc5.99%11.67%
Alphabet Inc5.91%5.76%
Alphabet Inc4.71%4.54%
Broadcom Inc5.04%4.29%
Amazon.com Inc3.48%4.47%
Meta Platforms Inc3.49%3.41%
Eli Lilly & Co2.67%2.81%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc2.67%2.62%
Tesla Inc2.07%3.27%
Applied Materials Inc1.62%1.60%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPYGOnly in VUG
Micron Technology Inc 3.67%Costco Wholesale Corp 1.16%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.58%Intel Corp 0.79%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.68%Western Digital Corp 0.62%
Caterpillar Inc 1.38%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.61%
Johnson & Johnson 1.02%Texas Instruments Inc 0.39%
RTX Corp 0.72%Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.36%
Cisco Systems Inc 0.69%Starbucks Corp 0.34%
AbbVie Inc 0.58%Equinix Inc 0.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

SPYG and VUG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPYG
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF
VUG
Vanguard Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetVanguard
What it isSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 GrowthUS growth
Total return, 1 year+17.9%+12.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.4 pts−4.6 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.03%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%97.4%
Holdings147147

SPYG in plain words

SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.

VUG in plain words

VUG is an index equity fund tracking the US growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 60.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPYG or VUG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYG returned +17.9% and VUG returned +12.9%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPYG or VUG?
SPYG charges 0.04% a year and VUG charges 0.03%, so VUG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPYG and VUG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYG and 97% of VUG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 77% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPYG against VUG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYG against VUG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPYG-VUG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources