Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPYG vs VTI: how they differ

SPYG and VTI hold 59% of their weight in the same names, and SPYG returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPYG and VTI hold 59% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPYG and VTI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPYGVTI
NVIDIA Corp13.66%6.37%
Apple Inc5.99%5.88%
Microsoft Corp7.81%3.84%
Amazon.com Inc3.48%3.19%
Alphabet Inc5.91%2.90%
Broadcom Inc5.04%2.48%
Alphabet Inc4.71%2.29%
Micron Technology Inc3.67%1.80%
Meta Platforms Inc3.49%1.71%
Tesla Inc2.07%1.64%
Eli Lilly & Co2.67%1.41%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc2.67%1.31%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPYGOnly in VTI
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.39%Exxon Mobil Corp 0.79%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 0.22%Intel Corp 0.78%
Flex Ltd 0.17%Walmart Inc 0.69%
Johnson Controls International plc 0.17%Costco Wholesale Corp 0.57%
Trane Technologies PLC 0.16%UnitedHealth Group Inc 0.52%
TE Connectivity PLC 0.11%Bank of America Corp 0.50%
Carnival Corp Ltd 0.10%Home Depot Inc/The 0.49%
STERIS PLC 0.03%Procter & Gamble Co/The 0.47%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

SPYG and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPYG
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetVanguard
What it isSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 GrowthUS total market
Total return, 1 year+17.9%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.4 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.03%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%88.3%
Holdings1473531

SPYG in plain words

SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.

VTI in plain words

VTI is an index equity fund tracking the US total market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPYG or VTI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYG returned +17.9% and VTI returned +17.2%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPYG or VTI?
SPYG charges 0.04% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPYG and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYG and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 59% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPYG against VTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYG against VTI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPYG-VTI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources