Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPYG vs VT: how they differ

SPYG and VT hold 36% of their weight in the same names, and VT returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPYG and VT hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPYG and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPYGVT
NVIDIA Corp13.66%4.22%
Apple Inc5.99%3.53%
Microsoft Corp7.81%2.73%
Amazon.com Inc3.48%2.29%
Alphabet Inc5.91%2.04%
Broadcom Inc5.04%1.74%
Alphabet Inc4.71%1.61%
Meta Platforms Inc3.49%1.21%
Tesla Inc2.07%0.97%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.68%0.72%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc2.58%0.69%
Eli Lilly & Co2.67%0.68%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPYGOnly in VT
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.39%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 0.22%Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 0.64%
Flex Ltd 0.17%Exxon Mobil Corp 0.59%
Johnson Controls International plc 0.17%Walmart Inc 0.52%
Trane Technologies PLC 0.16%ASML Holding NV 0.51%
TE Connectivity PLC 0.11%SK hynix Inc 0.44%
Carnival Corp Ltd 0.10%Costco Wholesale Corp 0.41%
STERIS PLC 0.03%Intel Corp 0.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

SPYG and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPYG
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetVanguard
What it isSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 GrowthTotal World Stock
Total return, 1 year+17.9%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.4 pts+1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.06%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%55.2%
Holdings14710042

SPYG in plain words

SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPYG or VT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYG returned +17.9% and VT returned +18.9%, so VT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPYG or VT?
SPYG charges 0.04% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPYG and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYG and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 36% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPYG against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYG against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPYG-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources