Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPYG vs VLUE: how they differ

SPYG and VLUE hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPYG and VLUE hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPYG and VLUE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPYGVLUE
Micron Technology Inc3.67%11.63%
Applied Materials Inc1.62%3.67%
Cisco Systems Inc0.69%4.97%
Newmont Corp0.28%0.64%
United Rentals Inc0.11%0.69%
Simon Property Group Inc0.08%0.62%
Expedia Group Inc0.08%0.51%
First Solar Inc0.07%0.47%
Jabil Inc0.07%0.57%
Fox Corp0.02%0.15%
Fox Corp0.01%0.10%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPYGOnly in VLUE
NVIDIA Corp 13.66%INTEL CORPORATION 9.29%
Microsoft Corp 7.81%GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY 3.16%
Apple Inc 5.99%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2.66%
Alphabet Inc 5.91%AT&T INC. 2.53%
Broadcom Inc 5.04%CITIGROUP INC. 1.94%
Alphabet Inc 4.71%WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION 1.89%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.49%BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.88%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 1.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

SPYG and VLUE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPYG
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetiShares
What it isSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 GrowthMSCI USA Value Factor
Total return, 1 year+17.9%+69.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.4 pts+51.9 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.15%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%96.9%
Holdings147148

SPYG in plain words

SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.

VLUE in plain words

VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPYG or VLUE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYG returned +17.9% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPYG or VLUE?
SPYG charges 0.04% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPYG and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYG and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPYG against VLUE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYG against VLUE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPYG-VLUE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources