Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPYG vs VB: how they differ

SPYG and VB hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and SPYG returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPYG and VB hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPYG and VB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPYGVB
EMCOR Group Inc0.10%0.45%
Casey's General Stores Inc0.08%0.36%
Tapestry Inc0.08%0.36%
First Solar Inc0.07%0.15%
Jabil Inc0.07%0.49%
NRG Energy Inc0.06%0.38%
Incyte Corp0.05%0.23%
Ralph Lauren Corp0.04%0.17%
EchoStar Corp0.04%0.17%
TKO Group Holdings Inc0.04%0.07%
Insulet Corp0.03%0.13%
Wynn Resorts Ltd0.02%0.09%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPYGOnly in VB
NVIDIA Corp 13.66%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%
Microsoft Corp 7.81%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%
Apple Inc 5.99%Astera Labs Inc 0.45%
Alphabet Inc 5.91%Natera Inc 0.45%
Broadcom Inc 5.04%Twilio Inc 0.38%
Alphabet Inc 4.71%MKS Instruments Inc 0.37%
Micron Technology Inc 3.67%Flex Ltd 0.36%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.49%Carpenter Technology Corp 0.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

SPYG and VB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPYG
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetVanguard
What it isSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 GrowthSmall-Cap
Total return, 1 year+17.9%+15.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.4 pts−2.3 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.03%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%21.7%
Holdings1471311

SPYG in plain words

SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPYG or VB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYG returned +17.9% and VB returned +15.2%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPYG or VB?
SPYG charges 0.04% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPYG and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYG and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPYG against VB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYG against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPYG-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources