Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPYD vs XLV: how they differ

SPYD and XLV hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and XLV returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPYD and XLV hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPYD and XLV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPYDXLV
CVS Health Corp1.53%2.30%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co1.27%2.05%
Pfizer Inc1.12%2.40%
Viatris Inc1.46%0.32%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPYDOnly in XLV
Iron Mountain Inc 1.62%Eli Lilly & Co 16.56%
Franklin Resources Inc 1.57%Johnson & Johnson 10.67%
Host Hotels & Resorts Inc 1.53%AbbVie Inc 7.76%
Edison International 1.48%UnitedHealth Group Inc 6.59%
Target Corp 1.48%Merck & Co Inc 5.54%
APA Corp 1.48%Amgen Inc 3.41%
Kimco Realty Corp 1.46%Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 3.25%
Simon Property Group Inc 1.45%Abbott Laboratories 2.76%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

SPYD and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPYD
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF
XLV
State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetState Street
What it isSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High DividendHealth care
Total return, 1 year+12.9%+20.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.6 pts+2.9 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.08%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%100.0%
Holdings7859

SPYD in plain words

SPYD is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 15.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLV in plain words

XLV is an index equity fund tracking the Health care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 59 positions, with the top ten at 61.7%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPYD or XLV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYD returned +12.9% and XLV returned +20.4%, so XLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPYD or XLV?
SPYD charges 0.07% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so SPYD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPYD and XLV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYD and 100% of XLV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPYD against XLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYD against XLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPYD-XLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources