Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPYD vs VOX: how they differ

SPYD and VOX hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and SPYD returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF and Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPYD and VOX hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPYD and VOX both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPYDVOX
Verizon Communications Inc1.30%4.17%
Omnicom Group Inc1.11%1.38%
AT&T Inc1.06%3.69%
Comcast Corp1.02%2.36%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPYDOnly in VOX
Iron Mountain Inc 1.62%Meta Platforms Inc 21.12%
Franklin Resources Inc 1.57%Alphabet Inc 16.14%
CVS Health Corp 1.53%Alphabet Inc 10.61%
Host Hotels & Resorts Inc 1.53%Netflix Inc 4.77%
Edison International 1.48%Walt Disney Co/The 3.96%
Target Corp 1.48%Warner Bros Discovery Inc 2.74%
APA Corp 1.48%T-Mobile US Inc 2.50%
Viatris Inc 1.46%Take-Two Interactive Software Inc 2.09%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SPYD and VOX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPYD
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF
VOX
Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetVanguard
What it isSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High DividendCommunication Services
Total return, 1 year+12.9%+2.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.6 pts−14.6 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.09%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%84.5%
Holdings78114

SPYD in plain words

SPYD is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 15.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VOX in plain words

VOX is an index equity fund tracking the Communication Services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 114 positions, with the top ten at 72.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPYD or VOX?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYD returned +12.9% and VOX returned +2.9%, so SPYD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPYD or VOX?
SPYD charges 0.07% a year and VOX charges 0.09%, so SPYD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPYD and VOX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYD and 84% of VOX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPYD against VOX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYD against VOX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPYD-VOX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources