Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPYD vs VO: how they differ
SPYD and VO hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and SPYD returned more over the year.
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SPYD and VO hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SPYD | VO |
|---|---|---|
| Simon Property Group Inc | 1.45% | 0.67% |
| Phillips 66 | 1.44% | 0.66% |
| Dominion Energy Inc | 1.35% | 0.58% |
| Target Corp | 1.48% | 0.57% |
| Realty Income Corp | 1.21% | 0.56% |
| ONEOK Inc | 1.38% | 0.53% |
| Ford Motor Co | 1.21% | 0.53% |
| Fifth Third Bancorp | 1.28% | 0.50% |
| Public Storage | 1.33% | 0.49% |
| Exelon Corp | 1.25% | 0.46% |
| Prudential Financial Inc | 1.19% | 0.36% |
| Archer-Daniels-Midland Co | 1.36% | 0.36% |
| Only in SPYD | Only in VO |
|---|---|
| Franklin Resources Inc 1.57% | Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23% |
| CVS Health Corp 1.53% | Western Digital Corp 1.07% |
| Host Hotels & Resorts Inc 1.53% | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05% |
| APA Corp 1.48% | Quanta Services Inc 1.05% |
| Viatris Inc 1.46% | Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04% |
| Kimco Realty Corp 1.46% | Cummins Inc 0.95% |
| Federal Realty Investment Trust 1.45% | Datadog Inc 0.84% |
| EOG Resources Inc 1.44% | Bloom Energy Corp 0.79% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| SPYD State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF | VO Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | Vanguard |
| What it is | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend | Mid-Cap |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.9% | +12.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −4.6 pts | −5.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 91.4% |
| Holdings | 78 | 282 |
SPYD in plain words
SPYD is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 15.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VO in plain words
VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPYD or VO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYD returned +12.9% and VO returned +12.0%, so SPYD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SPYD or VO?
- SPYD charges 0.07% a year and VO charges 0.03%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SPYD and VO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYD and 91% of VO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYD against VO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPYD-VO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources