Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPYD vs VB: how they differ
SPYD and VB hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and VB returned more over the year.
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SPYD and VB hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SPYD | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Omnicom Group Inc | 1.11% | 0.25% |
| Evergy Inc | 1.35% | 0.23% |
| Essex Property Trust Inc | 1.36% | 0.23% |
| Viatris Inc | 1.46% | 0.23% |
| Invitation Homes Inc | 1.32% | 0.22% |
| Kimco Realty Corp | 1.46% | 0.21% |
| Host Hotels & Resorts Inc | 1.53% | 0.20% |
| Mid-America Apartment Communities Inc | 1.24% | 0.20% |
| Best Buy Co Inc | 1.37% | 0.18% |
| Healthpeak Properties Inc | 1.44% | 0.18% |
| Regency Centers Corp | 1.35% | 0.18% |
| Stanley Black & Decker Inc | 1.35% | 0.18% |
| Only in SPYD | Only in VB |
|---|---|
| Iron Mountain Inc 1.62% | Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55% |
| CVS Health Corp 1.53% | Jabil Inc 0.49% |
| Edison International 1.48% | REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46% |
| Target Corp 1.48% | Astera Labs Inc 0.45% |
| Simon Property Group Inc 1.45% | Natera Inc 0.45% |
| EOG Resources Inc 1.44% | EMCOR Group Inc 0.45% |
| Phillips 66 1.44% | Twilio Inc 0.38% |
| Principal Financial Group Inc 1.42% | NRG Energy Inc 0.38% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| SPYD State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF | VB Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | Vanguard |
| What it is | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend | Small-Cap |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.9% | +15.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −4.6 pts | −2.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 21.7% |
| Holdings | 78 | 1311 |
SPYD in plain words
SPYD is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 15.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VB in plain words
VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPYD or VB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYD returned +12.9% and VB returned +15.2%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SPYD or VB?
- SPYD charges 0.07% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SPYD and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYD and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYD against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPYD-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources