Get alerts

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

SPY vs VUG

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust and Vanguard Growth Index Fund.

SPY and VUG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
VUG
Vanguard Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore fundCore fund
IssuerState StreetVanguard
What it isS&P 500, book from IVVUS growth
Total return, 1 year+20.0%+14.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.0 pts−5.1 pts
Expense rationot published0.03%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%97.4%
Holdings504147

SPY in plain words

SPY is a index equity fund tracking S&P 500, book from IVV. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

VUG in plain words

VUG is a index equity fund tracking US growth. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 60.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPY or VUG?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPY returned +20.0% and VUG returned +14.9%, so SPY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
How much do SPY and VUG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPY and 97% of VUG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPY against VUG, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPY-VUG.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources