Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BND vs VUG
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund and Vanguard Growth Index Fund.
| BND Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund | VUG Vanguard Growth Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | Vanguard |
| What it is | US aggregate bonds | US growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.3% | +14.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +20.0% | +20.0% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −18.7 pts | −5.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | n/a | 147 |
BND in plain words
BND is a bond fund tracking US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
VUG in plain words
VUG is a index equity fund tracking US growth. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 60.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BND or VUG?
- In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned +1.3% and VUG returned +14.9%, so VUG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, BND or VUG?
- BND charges 0.03% a year and VUG charges 0.03%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BND against VUG, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BND-VUG.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources