Get alerts

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

SPY vs VTV

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

SPY and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
VTV
Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore fundCore fund
IssuerState StreetVanguard
What it isS&P 500, book from IVVUS value
Total return, 1 year+20.0%+26.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.0 pts+6.3 pts
Expense rationot published0.03%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%98.6%
Holdings504308

SPY in plain words

SPY is a index equity fund tracking S&P 500, book from IVV. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

VTV in plain words

VTV is a index equity fund tracking US value. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +26.2% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPY or VTV?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPY returned +20.0% and VTV returned +26.2%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
How much do SPY and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPY and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPY against VTV, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPY-VTV.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources