Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BND vs VTV
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund and Vanguard Value Index Fund.
| BND Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund | VTV Vanguard Value Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | Vanguard |
| What it is | US aggregate bonds | US value |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.3% | +26.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +20.0% | +20.0% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −18.7 pts | +6.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | n/a | 308 |
BND in plain words
BND is a bond fund tracking US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
VTV in plain words
VTV is a index equity fund tracking US value. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +26.2% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BND or VTV?
- In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned +1.3% and VTV returned +26.2%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, BND or VTV?
- BND charges 0.03% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BND against VTV, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BND-VTV.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources