Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPLG vs ZSEP: how they differ

SPLG and ZSEP are funds of different kinds, on the fields both publish.

S&P 500, book from IVV and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr September.

SPLG and ZSEP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPLG
S&P 500, book from IVV
ZSEP
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr September
Where it sitsCore index fundBuffer ETF
IssuerS&PInnovator
What it isS&P 500, book from IVVDefined outcome, 100% on SPY
Total return, 1 year+17.6%not published
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%not published
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 ptsnot available
Expense rationot published0.79%

SPLG in plain words

SPLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

ZSEP in plain words

From its price on Sep 12, 2026, the fund can gain about 8.9% more before it reaches its cap. Protection left, in index points: 99.6% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 354 days remained on Sep 12, 2026. On Aug 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Are SPLG and ZSEP the same kind of fund?
No. SPLG is an index ETF and ZSEP is a buffer ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPLG against ZSEP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPLG against ZSEP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPLG-ZSEP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources