Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPLG vs XLV: how they differ
SPLG and XLV are both equity index funds, and over the year XLV returned more, +20.4% against +17.6%.
S&P 500, book from IVV and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
| SPLG S&P 500, book from IVV | XLV State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | S&P | State Street |
| What it is | S&P 500, book from IVV | Health care |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.6% | +20.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.1 pts | +2.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.08% |
| Holdings | not filed | 59 |
SPLG in plain words
SPLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
XLV in plain words
XLV is an index equity fund tracking the Health care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 59 positions, with the top ten at 61.7%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPLG or XLV?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPLG returned +17.6% and XLV returned +20.4%, so XLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPLG against XLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPLG-XLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources