Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPLG vs XLK: how they differ
SPLG and XLK are both equity index funds, and over the year XLK returned more, +39.2% against +17.6%.
S&P 500, book from IVV and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
| SPLG S&P 500, book from IVV | XLK State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | S&P | State Street |
| What it is | S&P 500, book from IVV | Technology |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.6% | +39.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.1 pts | +21.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.08% |
| Holdings | not filed | 74 |
SPLG in plain words
SPLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
XLK in plain words
XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPLG or XLK?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPLG returned +17.6% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPLG against XLK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPLG-XLK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources