Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPLG vs XHB: how they differ
SPLG and XHB are both equity index funds, and over the year SPLG returned more, +17.6% against −16.6%.
S&P 500, book from IVV and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF.
| SPLG S&P 500, book from IVV | XHB State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | S&P | State Street |
| What it is | S&P 500, book from IVV | SPDR S&P Homebuilders |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.6% | −16.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.1 pts | −34.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.35% |
| Holdings | not filed | 35 |
SPLG in plain words
SPLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
XHB in plain words
XHB is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Homebuilders. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 46% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 35 positions, with the top ten at 35.6%. It sat 20.6% below its high of Oct 18, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPLG or XHB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPLG returned +17.6% and XHB returned −16.6%, so SPLG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPLG against XHB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPLG-XHB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources