Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPLG vs VBIL: how they differ

SPLG is an equity index fund and VBIL a short-term Treasury fund, and over the year SPLG returned more, +17.6% against +3.8%.

S&P 500, book from IVV and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF.

SPLG and VBIL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPLG
S&P 500, book from IVV
VBIL
Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerS&PVanguard
What it isS&P 500, book from IVV0-3 Month Treasury Bill
Total return, 1 year+17.6%+3.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts−13.7 pts
Expense rationot published0.06%
Holdingsnot filed26

SPLG in plain words

SPLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

VBIL in plain words

VBIL is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 0-3 Month Treasury Bill. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPLG or VBIL?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPLG returned +17.6% and VBIL returned +3.8%, so SPLG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPLG against VBIL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPLG against VBIL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPLG-VBIL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources