Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPLG vs USEP: how they differ
SPLG and USEP are funds of different kinds, on the fields both publish.
S&P 500, book from IVV and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - Sep.
| SPLG S&P 500, book from IVV | USEP Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - Sep | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Buffer ETF |
| Issuer | S&P | Innovator |
| What it is | S&P 500, book from IVV | Defined outcome, 5% to 35% on SPY |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.6% | not published |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | not published |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.1 pts | not available |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.79% |
SPLG in plain words
SPLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
USEP in plain words
From its price on Sep 12, 2026, the fund can gain about 14.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 4.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 4.7% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 354 days remained on Sep 12, 2026. On Aug 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
- Are SPLG and USEP the same kind of fund?
- No. SPLG is an index ETF and USEP is a buffer ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPLG against USEP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPLG-USEP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources