Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPLG vs URTH: how they differ
SPLG and URTH are both equity index funds, and over the year they finished level, +17.6% against +17.4%.
S&P 500, book from IVV and iShares MSCI World ETF.
| SPLG S&P 500, book from IVV | URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | S&P | iShares |
| What it is | S&P 500, book from IVV | MSCI World |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.6% | +17.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.1 pts | −0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.24% |
| Holdings | not filed | 1322 |
SPLG in plain words
SPLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
URTH in plain words
URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1322 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPLG or URTH?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPLG returned +17.6% and URTH returned +17.4%, so SPLG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPLG against URTH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPLG-URTH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources