Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPLG vs TLT: how they differ

SPLG is an equity index fund and TLT a bond index fund, and over the year SPLG returned more, +17.6% against −6.4%.

S&P 500, book from IVV and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

SPLG and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPLG
S&P 500, book from IVV
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerS&PiShares
What it isS&P 500, book from IVV20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year+17.6%−6.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts−23.9 pts
Expense rationot published0.15%

SPLG in plain words

SPLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

TLT in plain words

TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPLG or TLT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPLG returned +17.6% and TLT returned −6.4%, so SPLG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPLG against TLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPLG against TLT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPLG-TLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources