Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SLV vs USHY: how they differ
SLV is a commodity fund and USHY a bond index fund, and over the year SLV returned more, +53.8% against +3.3%.
iShares Silver Trust and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF.
| SLV iShares Silver Trust | USHY iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Silver | Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | +53.8% | +3.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +36.3 pts | −14.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.08% |
| Holdings | not filed | 1894 |
SLV in plain words
SLV is a commodity fund tracking the Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +53.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. It sat 45.0% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
USHY in plain words
USHY is a bond fund tracking the Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SLV or USHY?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SLV returned +53.8% and USHY returned +3.3%, so SLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SLV or USHY?
- SLV charges 0.50% a year and USHY charges 0.08%, so USHY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SLV against USHY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SLV-USHY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources