Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SLV vs SPLG: how they differ

SLV is a commodity fund and SPLG an equity index fund, and over the year SLV returned more, +53.8% against +17.6%.

iShares Silver Trust and S&P 500, book from IVV.

SLV and SPLG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
SPLG
S&P 500, book from IVV
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesS&P
What it isSilverS&P 500, book from IVV
Total return, 1 year+53.8%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+36.3 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.50%not published

SLV in plain words

SLV is a commodity fund tracking the Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +53.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. It sat 45.0% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPLG in plain words

SPLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SLV or SPLG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SLV returned +53.8% and SPLG returned +17.6%, so SLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SLV against SPLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SLV against SPLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SLV-SPLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources