Which returned more over the last year, SIVR or XLG?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SIVR returned +54.2% and XLG returned +12.2%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SIVR vs XLG: how they differ

SIVR is a commodity fund and XLG an equity index fund, and over the year SIVR returned more, +54.2% against +12.2%.

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

SIVR and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	abrdn	Invesco
What it is	Physical Silver	S&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year	+54.2%	+12.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+36.7 pts	−5.3 pts
Expense ratio	not published	0.20%
Holdings	not filed	51

SIVR in plain words

SIVR is a commodity fund tracking the Physical Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +54.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 44.9% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLG in plain words

XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SIVR or XLG?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SIVR returned +54.2% and XLG returned +12.2%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SIVR against XLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SIVR against XLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SIVR-XLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources