Which returned more over the last year, SIVR or XLC?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SIVR returned +54.2% and XLC returned −2.0%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SIVR vs XLC: how they differ

SIVR is a commodity fund and XLC an equity index fund, and over the year SIVR returned more, +54.2% against −2.0%.

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

SIVR and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	XLC State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	abrdn	State Street
What it is	Physical Silver	Communication services
Total return, 1 year	+54.2%	−2.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+36.7 pts	−19.5 pts
Expense ratio	not published	0.08%
Holdings	not filed	23

SIVR in plain words

SIVR is a commodity fund tracking the Physical Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +54.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 44.9% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLC in plain words

XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 76.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SIVR or XLC?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SIVR returned +54.2% and XLC returned −2.0%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SIVR against XLC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SIVR against XLC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SIVR-XLC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources