Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SIVR vs VUSB: how they differ
SIVR is a commodity fund and VUSB a short-term Treasury fund, and over the year SIVR returned more, +54.2% against +3.7%.
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF and Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.
| SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | abrdn | Vanguard |
| What it is | Physical Silver | Ultra-Short Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | +54.2% | +3.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +36.7 pts | −13.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.10% |
| Holdings | not filed | 1281 |
SIVR in plain words
SIVR is a commodity fund tracking the Physical Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +54.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 44.9% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VUSB in plain words
VUSB is a cash and treasury bills tracking the Ultra-Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SIVR or VUSB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SIVR returned +54.2% and VUSB returned +3.7%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SIVR against VUSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SIVR-VUSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources