Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SIVR vs VGLT: how they differ

SIVR is a commodity fund and VGLT a bond index fund, and over the year SIVR returned more, +54.2% against −5.4%.

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund.

SIVR and VGLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerabrdnVanguard
What it isPhysical SilverLong-term Treasury
Total return, 1 year+54.2%−5.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+36.7 pts−22.9 pts

SIVR in plain words

SIVR is a commodity fund tracking the Physical Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +54.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 44.9% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VGLT in plain words

VGLT is a bond fund tracking the Long-term Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −5.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 39.2% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SIVR or VGLT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SIVR returned +54.2% and VGLT returned −5.4%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SIVR against VGLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SIVR against VGLT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SIVR-VGLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources