Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SHY vs SPLG: how they differ

SHY is a bond index fund and SPLG an equity index fund, and over the year SPLG returned more, +17.6% against +1.7%.

iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF and S&P 500, book from IVV.

SHY and SPLG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
SPLG
S&P 500, book from IVV
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesS&P
What it is1-3 Year Treasury BondS&P 500, book from IVV
Total return, 1 year+1.7%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−15.8 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.15%not published
Holdings89not filed

SHY in plain words

SHY is a bond fund tracking the 1-3 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

SPLG in plain words

SPLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SHY or SPLG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SHY returned +1.7% and SPLG returned +17.6%, so SPLG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SHY against SPLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SHY against SPLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SHY-SPLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources