Which returned more over the last year, SHV or XLU?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SHV returned +3.6% and XLU returned +2.4%, so SHV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, SHV or XLU?

SHV charges 0.15% a year and XLU charges 0.08%, so XLU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SHV vs XLU: how they differ

SHV and XLU hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SHV returned more over the year.

iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF and State Street(R) Utilities Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SHV and XLU hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SHV	Only in XLU
United States of America 17.17%	NextEra Energy Inc 12.93%
United States of America 12.38%	Southern Co/The 7.62%
United States of America 9.88%	Duke Energy Corp 6.97%
United States of America 8.60%	Constellation Energy Corp 5.61%
United States of America 8.55%	American Electric Power Co Inc 5.26%
United States of America 8.38%	Sempra 4.28%
United States of America 6.85%	Dominion Energy Inc 4.24%
United States of America 6.81%	Entergy Corp 3.71%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SHV and XLU on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF	XLU State Street(R) Utilities Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	0-1 Year Treasury Bond	Utilities
Total return, 1 year	+3.6%	+2.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−13.9 pts	−15.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.08%
Holdings	13	31

SHV in plain words

SHV is a bond fund tracking the 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

XLU in plain words

XLU is an index equity fund tracking the Utilities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 31 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%. It sat 10.0% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SHV or XLU?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SHV returned +3.6% and XLU returned +2.4%, so SHV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SHV or XLU?: SHV charges 0.15% a year and XLU charges 0.08%, so XLU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SHV against XLU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SHV against XLU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SHV-XLU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources