Which returned more over the last year, SHV or VUSB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SHV returned +3.6% and VUSB returned +3.7%, so VUSB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, SHV or VUSB?

SHV charges 0.15% a year and VUSB charges 0.10%, so VUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SHV vs VUSB: how they differ

SHV and VUSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF and Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SHV and VUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SHV	Only in VUSB
United States of America 17.17%	United States Treasury Bill 4.24%
United States of America 12.38%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.68%
United States of America 9.88%	PNC Financial Services Group Inc/The 0.59%
United States of America 8.60%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.53%
United States of America 8.55%	Regions Bank/Birmingham AL 0.52%
United States of America 8.38%	US Bancorp 0.51%
United States of America 6.85%	Charles Schwab Corp/The 0.50%
United States of America 6.81%	Truist Bank 0.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SHV and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF	VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	0-1 Year Treasury Bond	Ultra-Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+3.6%	+3.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−13.9 pts	−13.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.10%
Holdings	13	1281

SHV in plain words

SHV is a bond fund tracking the 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

VUSB in plain words

VUSB is a cash and treasury bills tracking the Ultra-Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SHV or VUSB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SHV returned +3.6% and VUSB returned +3.7%, so VUSB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SHV or VUSB?: SHV charges 0.15% a year and VUSB charges 0.10%, so VUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SHV against VUSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SHV against VUSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SHV-VUSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources