Which returned more over the last year, SHV or VCLT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SHV returned +3.6% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so SHV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, SHV or VCLT?

SHV charges 0.15% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SHV vs VCLT: how they differ

SHV and VCLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SHV returned more over the year.

iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SHV and VCLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SHV	Only in VCLT
United States of America 17.17%	Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch 0.38%
United States of America 12.38%	CVS Health Corp 0.34%
United States of America 9.88%	Meta Platforms Inc 0.29%
United States of America 8.60%	Boeing Co/The 0.27%
United States of America 8.55%	Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.27%
United States of America 8.38%	Amazon.com Inc 0.26%
United States of America 6.85%	Oracle Corp 0.24%
United States of America 6.81%	AT&T Inc 0.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

SHV and VCLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF	VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	0-1 Year Treasury Bond	Long-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+3.6%	−4.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−13.9 pts	−22.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.03%
Holdings	13	2775

SHV in plain words

SHV is a bond fund tracking the 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

VCLT in plain words

VCLT is a bond fund tracking the Long-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 18.1% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SHV or VCLT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SHV returned +3.6% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so SHV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SHV or VCLT?: SHV charges 0.15% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SHV against VCLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SHV against VCLT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SHV-VCLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources