Which returned more over the last year, SHV or VCIT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SHV returned +3.6% and VCIT returned −1.2%, so SHV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, SHV or VCIT?

SHV charges 0.15% a year and VCIT charges 0.03%, so VCIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SHV vs VCIT: how they differ

SHV and VCIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SHV returned more over the year.

iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SHV and VCIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SHV	Only in VCIT
United States of America 17.17%	Amazon.com Inc 0.31%
United States of America 12.38%	Boeing Co/The 0.28%
United States of America 9.88%	Meta Platforms Inc 0.28%
United States of America 8.60%	Bank of America Corp 0.27%
United States of America 8.55%	Oracle Corp 0.27%
United States of America 8.38%	Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.27%
United States of America 6.85%	Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch 0.27%
United States of America 6.81%	JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.25%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

SHV and VCIT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF	VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	0-1 Year Treasury Bond	Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+3.6%	−1.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−13.9 pts	−18.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.03%
Holdings	13	2302

SHV in plain words

SHV is a bond fund tracking the 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

VCIT in plain words

VCIT is a bond fund tracking the Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −1.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SHV or VCIT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SHV returned +3.6% and VCIT returned −1.2%, so SHV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SHV or VCIT?: SHV charges 0.15% a year and VCIT charges 0.03%, so VCIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SHV against VCIT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SHV against VCIT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SHV-VCIT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources