Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SGOV vs VGSH: how they differ
SGOV is a short-term Treasury fund and VGSH a bond index fund, and over the year SGOV returned more, +3.8% against +1.8%.
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Index Fund.
| SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | 0-3 month T-bills | Short-Term Treasury |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.8% | +1.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −13.7 pts | −15.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | not filed | 91 |
SGOV in plain words
SGOV is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 0-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year.
VGSH in plain words
VGSH is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SGOV or VGSH?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SGOV returned +3.8% and VGSH returned +1.8%, so SGOV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SGOV or VGSH?
- SGOV charges 0.09% a year and VGSH charges 0.03%, so VGSH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SGOV against VGSH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SGOV-VGSH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources