Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHX vs XHB: how they differ

SCHX and XHB hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and SCHX returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHX and XHB hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHX and XHB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHXXHB
Home Depot Inc/The0.46%3.28%
Lowe's Cos Inc0.18%3.03%
Trane Technologies PLC0.15%3.25%
Johnson Controls International plc0.12%3.11%
Carrier Global Corp0.07%3.20%
DR Horton Inc0.06%3.29%
Williams-Sonoma Inc0.04%3.34%
PulteGroup Inc0.03%3.44%
Lennar Corp0.03%2.99%
NVR Inc0.03%3.21%
Lennox International Inc0.02%3.37%
Somnigroup International Inc0.02%3.40%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHXOnly in XHB
NVIDIA Corp 7.51%KB Home 3.56%
Apple Inc 6.71%Meritage Homes Corp 3.53%
Microsoft Corp 4.89%Installed Building Products Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.87%Champion Homes Inc 3.34%
Alphabet Inc 3.24%Cavco Industries Inc 3.23%
Broadcom Inc 3.10%AAON Inc 3.11%
Alphabet Inc 2.58%Modine Manufacturing Co 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.02%Taylor Morrison Home Corp 2.97%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHX and XHB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
XHB
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabState Street
What it isU.S. Large-CapSPDR S&P Homebuilders
Total return, 1 year+16.8%−16.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.7 pts−34.1 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50094.9%45.7%
Holdings74835

SCHX in plain words

SCHX is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 748 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.

XHB in plain words

XHB is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Homebuilders. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 46% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 35 positions, with the top ten at 35.6%. It sat 20.6% below its high of Oct 18, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHX or XHB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHX returned +16.8% and XHB returned −16.6%, so SCHX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHX or XHB?
SCHX charges 0.03% a year and XHB charges 0.35%, so SCHX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHX and XHB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHX and 46% of XHB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHX against XHB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHX against XHB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHX-XHB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources