Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHX vs VONG: how they differ

SCHX and VONG hold 59% of their weight in the same names, and SCHX returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHX and VONG hold 59% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHX and VONG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHXVONG
NVIDIA Corp7.51%13.09%
Apple Inc6.71%11.97%
Microsoft Corp4.89%8.98%
Amazon.com Inc3.87%5.07%
Alphabet Inc3.24%3.91%
Broadcom Inc3.10%5.78%
Alphabet Inc2.58%3.15%
Meta Platforms Inc2.02%3.20%
Tesla Inc1.79%3.48%
Eli Lilly & Co1.28%2.67%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc1.23%1.47%
Visa Inc0.80%1.57%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHXOnly in VONG
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%Trane Technologies PLC 0.30%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.27%Spotify Technology SA 0.23%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.18%Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 0.22%
Exxon Mobil Corp 0.89%Aon PLC 0.18%
Johnson & Johnson 0.80%NU Holdings Ltd/Cayman Islands 0.13%
Intel Corp 0.79%FTAI Aviation Ltd 0.08%
Cisco Systems Inc 0.70%HEICO Corp 0.06%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 0.51%Restaurant Brands International Inc 0.05%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

SCHX and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isU.S. Large-CapRussell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+16.8%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.7 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50094.9%95.6%
Holdings748387

SCHX in plain words

SCHX is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 748 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHX or VONG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHX returned +16.8% and VONG returned +7.2%, so SCHX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHX or VONG?
SCHX charges 0.03% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so SCHX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHX and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHX and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 59% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHX against VONG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHX against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHX-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources