Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHX vs VNQ: how they differ

SCHX and VNQ hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and SCHX returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF and Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHX and VNQ hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHX and VNQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHXVNQ
Welltower Inc0.21%7.86%
Prologis Inc0.20%7.02%
Equinix Inc0.15%5.66%
American Tower Corp0.13%4.55%
Simon Property Group Inc0.10%3.54%
Digital Realty Trust Inc0.09%3.67%
Realty Income Corp0.08%3.12%
Public Storage0.07%2.54%
Crown Castle Inc0.06%2.06%
Ventas Inc0.06%2.20%
Iron Mountain Inc0.06%1.98%
CBRE Group Inc0.05%2.26%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHXOnly in VNQ
NVIDIA Corp 7.51%Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund 14.67%
Apple Inc 6.71%Brixmor Property Group Inc 0.49%
Microsoft Corp 4.89%American Healthcare REIT Inc 0.48%
Amazon.com Inc 3.87%Agree Realty Corp 0.47%
Alphabet Inc 3.24%CareTrust REIT Inc 0.47%
Broadcom Inc 3.10%First Industrial Realty Trust Inc 0.44%
Alphabet Inc 2.58%STAG Industrial Inc 0.38%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.02%Terreno Realty Corp 0.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHX and VNQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isU.S. Large-CapUS real estate
Total return, 1 year+16.8%+5.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.7 pts−11.9 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.13%
Already in the S&P 50094.9%63.3%
Holdings748146

SCHX in plain words

SCHX is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 748 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.

VNQ in plain words

VNQ is an index equity fund tracking the US real estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 63% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 54.9%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHX or VNQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHX returned +16.8% and VNQ returned +5.6%, so SCHX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHX or VNQ?
SCHX charges 0.03% a year and VNQ charges 0.13%, so SCHX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHX and VNQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHX and 63% of VNQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHX against VNQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHX against VNQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHX-VNQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources