Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHX vs VLUE: how they differ

SCHX and VLUE hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHX and VLUE hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHX and VLUE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHXVLUE
Micron Technology Inc1.60%11.63%
Intel Corp0.79%9.29%
Cisco Systems Inc0.70%4.97%
Applied Materials Inc0.52%3.67%
Bank of America Corp0.50%1.88%
Merck & Co Inc0.43%1.57%
QUALCOMM Inc0.39%1.80%
Wells Fargo & Co0.35%1.12%
Citigroup Inc0.32%1.94%
Verizon Communications Inc0.29%2.66%
Walt Disney Co/The0.26%1.09%
Western Digital Corp0.26%1.89%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHXOnly in VLUE
NVIDIA Corp 7.51%NXP Semiconductors N.V. 1.00%
Apple Inc 6.71%TE CONNECTIVITY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.93%
Microsoft Corp 4.89%ACCENTURE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.65%
Amazon.com Inc 3.87%Bunge Global SA 0.52%
Alphabet Inc 3.24%COTERRA ENERGY INC. 0.39%
Broadcom Inc 3.10%Carnival Corporation 0.33%
Alphabet Inc 2.58%APTIV PLC 0.31%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.02%FLEX LTD. 0.25%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHX and VLUE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabiShares
What it isU.S. Large-CapMSCI USA Value Factor
Total return, 1 year+16.8%+69.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.7 pts+51.9 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50094.9%96.9%
Holdings748148

SCHX in plain words

SCHX is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 748 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.

VLUE in plain words

VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHX or VLUE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHX returned +16.8% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHX or VLUE?
SCHX charges 0.03% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so SCHX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHX and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHX and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHX against VLUE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHX against VLUE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHX-VLUE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources