Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHP vs VGLT: how they differ

SCHP and VGLT are both bond index funds, and over the year SCHP returned more, −0.8% against −5.4%.

Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund.

SCHP and VGLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isUS TIPSLong-term Treasury
Total return, 1 year−0.8%−5.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−18.4 pts−22.9 pts
Expense ratio0.03%not published
Holdings48not filed

SCHP in plain words

SCHP is a bond fund tracking the US TIPS. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

VGLT in plain words

VGLT is a bond fund tracking the Long-term Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −5.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 39.2% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHP or VGLT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHP returned −0.8% and VGLT returned −5.4%, so SCHP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHP against VGLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHP against VGLT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHP-VGLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources