Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHG vs XBI: how they differ

SCHG and XBI hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and XBI returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and XBI hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHG and XBI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHGXBI
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc0.40%1.06%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc0.22%0.96%
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc0.14%0.96%
Natera Inc0.11%1.17%
Insmed Inc0.08%1.08%
Moderna Inc0.06%1.41%
Neurocrine Biosciences Inc0.06%0.97%
Roivant Sciences Ltd0.05%1.16%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHGOnly in XBI
NVIDIA Corp 11.02%Apogee Therapeutics Inc 1.49%
Apple Inc 9.84%Twist Bioscience Corp 1.41%
Microsoft Corp 7.18%Oruka Therapeutics Inc 1.38%
Amazon.com Inc 5.68%Kymera Therapeutics Inc 1.36%
Alphabet Inc 4.76%Viking Therapeutics Inc 1.31%
Broadcom Inc 4.55%Praxis Precision Medicines Inc 1.29%
Tesla Inc 3.92%Erasca Inc 1.27%
Alphabet Inc 3.78%Revolution Medicines Inc 1.21%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHG and XBI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
XBI
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabState Street
What it isU.S. Large-Cap GrowthSPDR S&P Biotech
Total return, 1 year+12.7%+64.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.8 pts+46.5 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50095.4%8.5%
Holdings193150

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

XBI in plain words

XBI is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Biotech. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +64.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 8% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 13.3%. It sat 9.6% below its high of Feb 8, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or XBI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +12.7% and XBI returned +64.0%, so XBI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHG or XBI?
SCHG charges 0.04% a year and XBI charges 0.35%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHG and XBI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHG and 8% of XBI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHG against XBI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHG against XBI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHG-XBI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources