Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHG vs VO: how they differ

SCHG and VO hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and SCHG returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and VO hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHG and VO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHGVO
Vertiv Holdings Co0.42%1.23%
Quanta Services Inc0.37%1.05%
Constellation Energy Corp0.31%0.78%
Snowflake Inc0.31%0.41%
Fortinet Inc0.30%0.46%
Datadog Inc0.28%0.84%
Cloudflare Inc0.27%0.76%
Monolithic Power Systems Inc0.27%0.63%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc0.27%0.36%
Robinhood Markets Inc0.26%0.77%
Phillips 660.25%0.66%
TransDigm Group Inc0.25%0.72%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHGOnly in VO
NVIDIA Corp 11.02%Western Digital Corp 1.07%
Apple Inc 9.84%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05%
Microsoft Corp 7.18%Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04%
Amazon.com Inc 5.68%Cummins Inc 0.95%
Alphabet Inc 4.76%Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%
Broadcom Inc 4.55%Valero Energy Corp 0.75%
Tesla Inc 3.92%Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 0.74%
Alphabet Inc 3.78%Teradyne Inc 0.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHG and VO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isU.S. Large-Cap GrowthMid-Cap
Total return, 1 year+12.7%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.8 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50095.4%91.4%
Holdings193282

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or VO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +12.7% and VO returned +12.0%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHG or VO?
SCHG charges 0.04% a year and VO charges 0.03%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHG and VO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHG and 91% of VO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHG against VO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHG against VO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHG-VO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources