Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHG vs VLUE: how they differ

SCHG and VLUE hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and VLUE hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHG and VLUE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHGVLUE
Walt Disney Co/The0.63%1.09%
United Rentals Inc0.22%0.69%
Strategy Inc0.17%0.30%
Humana Inc0.13%0.14%
Roper Technologies Inc0.12%0.21%
Teledyne Technologies Inc0.10%0.27%
Zoom Communications Inc0.09%0.53%
Super Micro Computer Inc0.08%0.08%
Okta Inc0.07%0.07%
First Citizens BancShares Inc/NC0.07%0.12%
Deckers Outdoor Corp0.06%0.08%
Waters Corp0.13%0.04%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHGOnly in VLUE
NVIDIA Corp 11.02%MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 11.63%
Apple Inc 9.84%INTEL CORPORATION 9.29%
Microsoft Corp 7.18%CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 4.97%
Amazon.com Inc 5.68%APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 3.67%
Alphabet Inc 4.76%GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY 3.16%
Broadcom Inc 4.55%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2.66%
Tesla Inc 3.92%AT&T INC. 2.53%
Alphabet Inc 3.78%CITIGROUP INC. 1.94%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHG and VLUE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabiShares
What it isU.S. Large-Cap GrowthMSCI USA Value Factor
Total return, 1 year+12.7%+69.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.8 pts+51.9 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50095.4%96.9%
Holdings193148

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

VLUE in plain words

VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or VLUE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +12.7% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHG or VLUE?
SCHG charges 0.04% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHG and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHG and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHG against VLUE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHG against VLUE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHG-VLUE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources